I don't go back often enough and write down my beer results, especially with flawed batches, so I thought I would make sure to record this one. I brewed my 27th beer, a Scottish 80 shilling over 4 months ago and have been slowly trying them out. I often experiment in beers, trying new techniques or ingredients and rarely going "to style". In some of those cases it doesn't turn out well, whether this is due to the new technique/ingredient or not paying close enough attention to the basics. While it can sometimes be hard to determine the exact cause of off flavors, in this case it seems to be a combination of the malt (specifically the kiln-coffee and maybe the pale chocolate) and the yeast (likely too high a fermentation temperature for the Scottish yeast).
A- A fairly clear medium brown with a small head that never fades.
S- Aromas of chocolate, biscuit, coffee and over ripe cherries. While not bad the fruit is a little stronger than I would have liked and seems to clash with the light roast and coffee.
T- Like the nose the fruitiness seems to stand out with a sweet biscuity coffee character also showing up. Finishes long and slightly puckering with a lingering sweet and stale effect.
M- Medium-low in body with moderate carbonation. This aspect is at least right on target.
O/D- While this beer is clearly flawed it really is hard to pinpoint the cause. Maybe the coffee malt just doesn't belong, maybe fermented at a lower temperature the fruitiness wouldn't muddle the mix, maybe the pale chocolate malt was a little too old and stale, in any case this is my second time having poor results with Wyeast's Scottish Ale yeast and will likely keep me from using it again for quite some time.
Showing posts with label beer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label beer. Show all posts
Thursday, October 3, 2013
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
#30 - Amarillo IPA
Finding myself with 3 oz. of Amarillo hops, an open fermentor and no hoppy beers sitting around I decided it was time to brew another American IPA. While my #28 American Saison features Amarillo and was designed to have a mild hoppiness this beer was intended to be much more bitter and hop forward without yeast character. In order to up the bitter hop character I used a much different water chemistry profile than I had and added quite a bit of gypsum with just a touch of calcium carbonate. The simple mash (2-row with just a touch of Vienna and Carastan) made for a fairly easy brewday, though I once again missed my target gravity. I brought a few bottles of this beer to the beach with me and they were finished fairly quickly. It's a very pleasant beer but not one that wouldl stand out in a crowd.
10/04/13
Wanted to do a tasting of this IPA...unfortunately (fortunately?) it appears my dad really enjoyed it and there aren't any bottles remaining. Probably for the best with a beer this hoppy which deserves to be enjoyed fresh. Only wish I'd taken a little more notes to have a better sense of how to tweak it next time around. Also wish I had taken a picture since that's really all this post has been waiting on since brew day in July. As the saying goes, only the good die young, and this was a good beer.
A Brief Brew Like a Monk Book Review

I've been holding off on writing this review both because I had other things to write about an because I wasn't entirely sure how I felt. Stan Hieronymus' Brew Like a Monk can be a really interesting and fun read at times with beer and monastery histories and descriptions flowing off the page. At other times it feels as though things are a jumble, processes and facts get repeated or thrown out at strange times. While I like the way the author goes about making each brewery and its beer into a story, it sometimes feels as though there's nothing to tell.
On the actual recipe formulation side of the book some of the recipes given seem a bit off and he often utilizes brewers to come up with recipes for styles they don't brew or at the least don't specialize in. Why not ask them about something they actually know? While I'm sure Ron Jeffries (Jolly Pumpkin) or Vinnie Cilurzo (Russian River) respective recipes for a Blonde and a Golden strong are nice, I would much rather they gave ideas for sours which they specialize in, or at least Orval clone ideas.
All around I found the book a worthwhile straight through read which I may come back to next time I brew a Trappist inspired beer and which helped in formulating my recent quad recipe. Far from the worst but also not among the best as far as beer books go. I look forward to reading the author's other work including For the Love of Hops: The Practical Guide to Aroma, Bitterness and the Culture of Hops but hope it is better edited and less scatterbrain.
Sunday, June 2, 2013
#28 - American Saison
Saison is one of my favorite styles of beer especially on hot summer days. It is also a very versatile style that I have experimented with a few variations over the last two years. For this variation I wanted to go with something a little more traditional than my past recipes but with a slight twist, in this case influenced by Boulevard Tank 7 by adding Amarillo hops and Ommegang Hennepin by adding ginger.
http://www.brewtoad.com/recipes/american-saison-15
One important aspect of this recipe was keeping the fermentation warm to keep the DuPont strain going and to elicit the classic pepper and fruit character. In order to try to maintain this warm temperature I wrapped the fermentor in towels and blankets and places a box over top to keep this insulation in place.
Sampled a few highly regarded beers of the style on brew day and saves the yeast (Brett and Sacc) from Saison de Lente.
Update 6/2/13
Down to 1.038, fermentation seems to have at least slowed if not stopped entirely and temperature has clearly dropped closer to the ambient low 60's than the 70s/80s it had been at for the first few. I will probably add the French Saison strain if I don't see a sizeable drop in gravity in a week.
6/9/2013
Down to 1.030, not as big a drop as I would like to see so I will purchase the French Saison yeast and add next week barring a bigger drop. Smell is black pepper, ginger and citrusy tropical hops.
7/14/2013
After 2 weeks with the Wyeast 3711 French Saison yeast the beer has plummeted down to a 1.002 gravity, time to bottle. Taste is refreshing with some citrus characteristics and a surprising amount of candy sweetness despite the measured dryness.
7/28/2013
Bottled using conditioning tablets (4 tabs/12 oz or 6/22 oz). Tastes strongly of citrus with some solid pit fruits and a prickliness, and a balancing but not aggressive bitterness.
Sunday, May 19, 2013
#27 Scottish Export and Water Chemistry
Looking to balance my sour and hoppy beers of recent with something a bit dark and malty but not as dark as the banana stout I decided to try my hand at a Scottish Export ale. While I have been taking water chemistry into account for a while now I did a full water profile for this beer adding minerals to my moderately soft water to reach a bit more complex character.
Update 6/9/13
Gravity down to 1.010, seems ready to bottle. Initial impression is sweet coffee character, more than I had expected from this small amoun of kiln coffee malt.
7/30/13
Had waited to post this hoping it would improve over time but it still seems a bit off. This is the second time I've had issues with Wyeast1728 Scottish Ale yeast. This may be coincidental, be a factor of the yeast strain which I'm particularly sensitive to or maybe due to fermentation temperatures. While it's hard to pin this beer's off flavor on a single characteristic (it reminds me a bit of both oxidation and autolysis without sticking out as either) the yeast or the malt (old pale chocolate malt and my first time using Franco-belges kiln coffee malt) seem the most likely suspects. I'm hoping some of this character will fade or blend into the beer over time and this will become more drinkable.
10/3/13
Beer hasn't really improved with time but I decided to do a more complete tasting anyway.
In Grodz We Trust, #26 Tasting
About a month back I brewed my second smoked beer, a Gratzer (or Grodziskie in Polish) and American Wheat hybrid I call in Grodz we trust. Classically using entirely or near entirely oak smoked wheat malt, Grodziskie has disappeared and made a bit of a resurgence with American craft versions popping up every now and then. In my attempt I wanted only a slight bit of smokiness to blend in with a dry, dry hopped wheat beer base.
A- Pours a clear pretty yellow color which I chose to add the yeast to, giving a nice Hoegaarden like Wit color with constant carbonation bubble movement throughout. Small head fades to a thin layer and leaves some lacing.
S- Similar to many of my other dry hopped beers as the Strisselspalt really shows up with light earth, spice, vegetal and fruity black currant aroma, just a touch of smoke mixed in.
T- The smoke takes center stage with a woody chargrilled character that is followed with earthy and spicy hops and a finish that is lightly bitter and still phenol smokey.
M- Very light, dry and thin with moderate carbonation. This one is right where I was aiming for in terms of the mouthfeel.
O- This is a strange beer that is hard to pin down. It's impossible for me to say how close it comes to a traditional Gratzer but I could see it being a popular beer among those who like smoked beers. That said the moderate bitterness and hop aroma combined with the moderate smoke give a strange impression. If I were to brew again I would likely cut the smoke in half to allow the hops to be more at the front or cut the smoke entirely and add more ginger to let the spice notes really play. A drinkable, sessionable summer beer that will probably go great with grilling but certainly won't please most.
A- Pours a clear pretty yellow color which I chose to add the yeast to, giving a nice Hoegaarden like Wit color with constant carbonation bubble movement throughout. Small head fades to a thin layer and leaves some lacing.
S- Similar to many of my other dry hopped beers as the Strisselspalt really shows up with light earth, spice, vegetal and fruity black currant aroma, just a touch of smoke mixed in.
T- The smoke takes center stage with a woody chargrilled character that is followed with earthy and spicy hops and a finish that is lightly bitter and still phenol smokey.
M- Very light, dry and thin with moderate carbonation. This one is right where I was aiming for in terms of the mouthfeel.
O- This is a strange beer that is hard to pin down. It's impossible for me to say how close it comes to a traditional Gratzer but I could see it being a popular beer among those who like smoked beers. That said the moderate bitterness and hop aroma combined with the moderate smoke give a strange impression. If I were to brew again I would likely cut the smoke in half to allow the hops to be more at the front or cut the smoke entirely and add more ginger to let the spice notes really play. A drinkable, sessionable summer beer that will probably go great with grilling but certainly won't please most.
Labels:
beer,
gratzer,
grodziskie,
homebrew,
smoked,
tasting,
wheat beer
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Banana Stout tasting and brew house updates
I had not yet posted a tasting of my banana stout as I had been consistently disappointed by it. Today I came home to bottle the table Belgian I made as a side to the quad several weeks ago. I also decided to check on my other on-going projects and make some decisions on them. I'll start with the updates.
Quad: down to 10.13 this one appears done fermenting. Flavor is great with some caramel, spice and fruit mixing with a little boozy heat. I plan to move this to secondary today for two weeks before bottling.
Small Belgian: this one has a lot more off flavors than the quad and seems to have some serious chunks of protein. Nevertheless I need the Carboy and have no intention of dumping so I will bottle today.
Brett Bitter: still a touch more bitter than I would like but it seems a great base for a fruit beer otherwise. Might add blackberries in 2 weeks.
Sour Brown: awesome! This beer seems to have regained a bit of its toasty biscuity qualities while also continuing to develop acid and berry flavors. Really happy with where this is.
Now on to the tasting.
A- opaque black with a big tan head that fades to a pretty one finger layer.
S- fruity as it pours, though not a huge nose in the glass. A little coffee and fruit (I smell banana but my Dad says apricot) shines through.
T- definite overripe banana with some light spice and a little classic stout roastiness. Finishes with a dry roast bitterness.
M- over carbonated which leaves it a bit spritzy. Could definitely use a chewier body too.
D- this beer has improved over time. Still not good beer quality but an interesting experiment. The lactose doesn't seem noticeable so I would use twice as much in the next milk stout I make.
Quad: down to 10.13 this one appears done fermenting. Flavor is great with some caramel, spice and fruit mixing with a little boozy heat. I plan to move this to secondary today for two weeks before bottling.
Small Belgian: this one has a lot more off flavors than the quad and seems to have some serious chunks of protein. Nevertheless I need the Carboy and have no intention of dumping so I will bottle today.
Brett Bitter: still a touch more bitter than I would like but it seems a great base for a fruit beer otherwise. Might add blackberries in 2 weeks.
Sour Brown: awesome! This beer seems to have regained a bit of its toasty biscuity qualities while also continuing to develop acid and berry flavors. Really happy with where this is.
Now on to the tasting.
A- opaque black with a big tan head that fades to a pretty one finger layer.
S- fruity as it pours, though not a huge nose in the glass. A little coffee and fruit (I smell banana but my Dad says apricot) shines through.
T- definite overripe banana with some light spice and a little classic stout roastiness. Finishes with a dry roast bitterness.
M- over carbonated which leaves it a bit spritzy. Could definitely use a chewier body too.
D- this beer has improved over time. Still not good beer quality but an interesting experiment. The lactose doesn't seem noticeable so I would use twice as much in the next milk stout I make.
Saturday, January 5, 2013
2012 Year in Re-brew and Brewing Goals
Looking back at my goals from 2012 I have the following:
- Brewing a sour
- Making a wine or mead and a cider
- Brewing at least 60 gallons of beer
- Brewing at least one of my very experimental beer ideas (smoked fruit beer, caraway spiced rye beer, herb beer, etc...)
- Brewing an all grain batch
Of these goals I certainly accomplished 2: brewing a sour (the sour brown is still in secondary) and brewing an all grain batch (I in fact brewed multiple all grain batches). I partially satisfied two goals as I brewed a cider and made a somewhat experimental beer in my peated porter, but didn't make anything too experimental and didn't make a mead or wine. I also came up short in the number of gallons I brewed with just 10 batches at 5 gallons each, plus 1 gallon of cider. All-in-all it was a mixed bag year for brewing with a few very good beers coming out of it and some techniques learned. On the other hand there were some bad batches and my brew in a bag ability still lacks. Rather than set specific one year goals for 2013 I decided to simply list some short (hopefully next few months), medium (hopefully within a year), and long (hopefully at some point) term goals.
Short Term Goals
- Attend a brew club meeting. I've been meaning to do this for a while and the timing has never worked out.
- Enter a competition. I need to have a beer I feel is competition worthy or a competition I'm not embarrassed to enter with an "okay" beer. Hopefully one of the two will happen soon.
- Obtain a new all grain system. I've been disappointed with the limitations and the quality I have gotten from my brew in a bag setup and decided that I should move to a cooler system.
- Rebrew a beer. I am yet to have done a "rebrew" of a beer. While I might not use the exact same ingredients I plan to remake my black saison again with a very similar recipe, hopefully with just as much success.
Medium Term Goals
- Make a mead. I've been wanting to make a mead for a long time and my brother beginning to make mead and wine (living in Napa Valley certainly helps with that) has made me even more intrigued.
- Make a wine. Again, this is something I've wanted to do for a while and just haven't gotten around to.
- Brew a DCambic or Marylambic more appropriately. Essentially the plan is to use the wild yeasts I caught in November and brew a full beer with them.
- Brew another sour. When my current sour finishes I hope to brew a second one using the yeast cake, in addition to my local wild ale.
- Host a tasting. I've been planning this for a while but haven't figure out exactly how I would do it. This could be a simple tasting and reviewing session or a pairing with cheese or full courses. Regardless of how its done it would be fun to get some honest opinions on my beers and share them with friends.
Long Term Goals
- Attend the National Homebrewers Conference and/or Great American Beer Festival.
- Win a competition. I would like to make beer of quality high enough to at least win a category.
- Have a blending session. With the current sour beer I am making, and the others I plan to make in the future, it could be interesting to blend some of these together. In addition to blending the beers on my own, it could be fun to have a few friends over to join in and make their own blend.
- Set up a yeast lab. This isn't something I could do now but having read other blogs and recently getting the book: Yeast, my interest has piqued.
- Begin kegging/build a kegerator. While I don't mind bottling it might be nice to be able to have at least some beers on tap, especially having some stouts or porters on nitro could be fun.
- Brew a lager. Again, something I don't currently have the capacity for but would be fun to try if and when I have my own setup where I could control temperatures.
- Take another beer influenced trip. Maybe a return to Belgium or actually making it to Cologne and Dusseldorf?
With these goals I don't feel the need to brew certain styles at certain times but have some idea of what I would like to do moving forward. Hopefully 2013 will have some more great beers.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
American IPA
I brewed my first straight forward, traditional IPA this past weekend. While I put a little bit of my own twist on it by using some Golden Naked Oats and untraditional flavoring/aroma hops of Warrior and Nugget (and planning to dryhop with some German Opal) the recipe was one of the most "to style" that I have made. I had some trouble keeping the mini mash part at a low temp. It actually was around 146-148 for a while but slowly raised to 160 after adding some heat, we'll see what that does to the body. The OG was measured at 1.068 and had a refreshingly bitter finish before fermentation. This should end up a nice dry hoppy IPA.
Updates:
12/30/12
Finally bottled with 4 oz. of sugar
1/5/13
Cracked the first one of these open. Certainly not as bitter as I had expected, more balanced with sweetness but it seems to be a nice pale ale at this point.
Sunday, November 11, 2012
Spiced Belgian Tasting
Haven't done a tasting in a while and just popped open my strong/spiced Belgian ale.
A- Cloudy amber with a large head that fades slowly leaving no lacing. Pretty bubbles in the tan head.
S- Spice, clove and cardamom, lead the way with some caramel, prune and fig notes.
T- Like the nose the spice dominates with clove dominating but a mild toasty flavor and some fig/cherry fruit also in the mix. Finishes long and dry with a bit of tang and hops.
M- Fairly thin, accentuated by the fairly high carbonation. The carbonation gives it a bit of a bite on the dry finish.
O- A quite pleasant beer with the Rochefort yeast giving strong spice notes that are even more accentuated by the additions. The wine has faded entirely giving no noticeable contribution. This one wasn't what I was going for with the beer and the carbonation could be dialed back some, but still very enjoyable. The alcohol also really sneaks up on you in this one. Very strong but no alcohol presence until you feel it all over.
A- Cloudy amber with a large head that fades slowly leaving no lacing. Pretty bubbles in the tan head.
S- Spice, clove and cardamom, lead the way with some caramel, prune and fig notes.
T- Like the nose the spice dominates with clove dominating but a mild toasty flavor and some fig/cherry fruit also in the mix. Finishes long and dry with a bit of tang and hops.
M- Fairly thin, accentuated by the fairly high carbonation. The carbonation gives it a bit of a bite on the dry finish.
O- A quite pleasant beer with the Rochefort yeast giving strong spice notes that are even more accentuated by the additions. The wine has faded entirely giving no noticeable contribution. This one wasn't what I was going for with the beer and the carbonation could be dialed back some, but still very enjoyable. The alcohol also really sneaks up on you in this one. Very strong but no alcohol presence until you feel it all over.
Saturday, October 13, 2012
Sour Brown (Funky Kast #2)
I brewed a sour brown ale back on August 26th, 2012. This was intended to be a bit like the traditional flanders brown/oud bruin . I haven't made one of these before and have only even drank the similar Flanders Red style but it seemed pretty similar to a Northern English brown ale in terms of recommended ingredients. In this spirit I used a grain bill similar to one from an English brown with a full pound of victory malt and an oz. of willamette for bittering. This beer will probably sit in the primary for 1-2 months, secondary for 6-12 and bottles for another 6-12. It's a long way off from the first tasting but I'm already excited.
8/26/2012 BIAB Mashed at 148F for 60 minutes. Sparged at 160 F. OG was only 1.032. Pitched the Roeselare pack with no starter.
3-2-13
This beer continues to improve. Still around 1.005 but more complex in its sour and funk.
8/26/2012
9/1/2012
Realized that the OG was so low due to forgetting a pound each of Caramunich (not a big deal in terms of gravity) and DME (a big difference). I steeped the pound of caramunich in a little over a half gallon of water, then added the DME and boiled. Cooled and added into the glass carboy. Big blow off began within an hour.
10-7-12
Added dregs from 3 Fonteinen Oude Geuze.
10-13-12
Big lacto bubbles on top of this beer now (hard to see in the picture but there's one in the top left), seems the Drie Fonteinen dregs were pretty aggressive.. I added dregs from Lindemans' Cuvee Rene. With dregs of two of the better geuzes I've tried this one should end up nice and funky.
1-12-13
The lacto bubbles have faded and now a thin brett pellicle covers the top. Gravity is now down to 1.007. Smell is not very pleasant (a little bit of "outhouse") but taste is more berry and sour with just a touch of sweetness. The initial characteristics from the malt of toast have faded almost entirely. Not sure what to do with this one, so I will probably continue the wait and see approach.
2-2-13
Gravity continues to fall slightly, now hovering between 1.005 and 1.006. This beer is tasty now, but probably won't be safe to bottle for another 6-18 months.
10-7-12
Added dregs from 3 Fonteinen Oude Geuze.
10-13-12
Big lacto bubbles on top of this beer now (hard to see in the picture but there's one in the top left), seems the Drie Fonteinen dregs were pretty aggressive.. I added dregs from Lindemans' Cuvee Rene. With dregs of two of the better geuzes I've tried this one should end up nice and funky.
1-12-13
The lacto bubbles have faded and now a thin brett pellicle covers the top. Gravity is now down to 1.007. Smell is not very pleasant (a little bit of "outhouse") but taste is more berry and sour with just a touch of sweetness. The initial characteristics from the malt of toast have faded almost entirely. Not sure what to do with this one, so I will probably continue the wait and see approach.
2-2-13
Gravity continues to fall slightly, now hovering between 1.005 and 1.006. This beer is tasty now, but probably won't be safe to bottle for another 6-18 months.
3-2-13
This beer continues to improve. Still around 1.005 but more complex in its sour and funk.
5-18-13
Tastes too good to hold off bottling anymore, full batch ha 3.5 oz sugar added with 1 case worth bottled an the rest moved to a 3 gallon Carboy for secondary. Flavor is moderately fruity with solid but not overpowering complex sourness. Possibly the best sour beer I've ever tasted even flat.
6-9-13
Taste a bottle, still fairly flat. Aggressively sour with some light fruit. Not quite the complexity I would like but it will be interesting to see where the carbonation takes it. I also added the BKYeast C2 Brett to the unbottled half which has taken over, hopefully upping the fruitiness to balance the sour.
11-25-13
Bottled 2 gallons with 1 oz sugar. The previously bottled version is aggressively acetic which detracts from the roast/fruit flavors. I don't have high hopes for this half of the batch but letting it go any longer would probably not help.
11-25-13
Bottled 2 gallons with 1 oz sugar. The previously bottled version is aggressively acetic which detracts from the roast/fruit flavors. I don't have high hopes for this half of the batch but letting it go any longer would probably not help.
Monday, October 8, 2012
Euro Trip 2012
Let me start by stating that I had never been to Europe. Let me then follow that up with the statement that I love many European beers. In planning our trip to Europe my girlfriend's number one request was that we visit a country she has never been to (she's been to Europe a lot) and my only request was that we got to experience some great beer. The result: We spent 4 days in Belgium with visits to Cantillon in Brussels and De Halve Maan in Bruges. Our original itinerary also included Koln (home of Kolsch) and Dusseldorf (home of Dusseldorf Alt) but due to time and cost restraints we cut Germany entirely (it was still a bit of a whirlwind).
The itinerary was:
-London
-Paris
-Amsterdam
-Bruges
-Ghent
-Brussels
-London
Now that I'm back I understand that there is no way I can do all the beers and all the experiences I had in Europe justice with a blog post. That said, I'm going to do my best to keep it concise and record what I can.
I'll start with brewery tours:
While the Heineken Experience isn't as much of a brewery per se, it is the site where their main brewery once stood and, combined with De Halve Maan in Bruges, Belgium and Cantillon in Brussels, Belgium the 3 gave a very interesting view into the world of beer. The Heineken Experience was a fun (but pricey) display of Heineken's history and ability to market itself. Much of the attractions inside are either wholly unrelated to beer (digital displays or soccer uniforms) or are high tech displays of the brewing process (films about the first 3 generations of Heineken or the We-Brew-You 4d ride. The experience shows a world wide macro beer producer doing what it does best: putting forth a consistent and well advertised product.
While the breweries were great, I made it a point to drink at least 1 beer every day of the trip and have one local beer from every region visited. This taught me two valuable things:
1. Real Ales (especially very sessionable bitters) are very common, tasty but also expensive. These 3-4% ABV beers typically cost around 5 GBP (about $8).
2. Trappist (and Trappist style and lambic) beers in Belgium are extremely common (most restaurants seemed to offer a handful of each of these styles) and are extremely cheap. It is about the same cost for Rochefort, Westmalle, Chimay, Duvel and Cantillon in beer shops and bars as it is for Heineken, Hoegaarden and Stella Artois! Suffice it to say I LOVED Belgium and the problem was much more often too many beers to choose from than not enough. I had my fill of a number of Geuzes. In that arena Cantillon came in second to Drie Fonteinen in my book with a slight lead over Boon and Tilquin and way better than Oud Beersel. As for Trappists I liked Chimay more than I remembered but also enjoyed Rochefort a lot (wasn't a huge fan of La Trappe or Westmalle) and brought a Westy 12 and Achel home so I can try the only two trappists I'm yet to have experienced.
While I could write books and books about my trip, European beer or even just Belgian beer I think that's more than enough for one blog post.
The itinerary was:
-London
-Paris
-Amsterdam
-Bruges
-Ghent
-Brussels
-London
Now that I'm back I understand that there is no way I can do all the beers and all the experiences I had in Europe justice with a blog post. That said, I'm going to do my best to keep it concise and record what I can.
I'll start with brewery tours:
Heineken Experience in Amsterdam, flashy and modern |
A poster at De Halve Maan (formerly Henri Maes) brewery in Bruges,. |
The second brewery we visited was De Halve Maan in Bruges, the only remaining brewery in a city that had 8 as recent as 50 years ago. How has De Halve Maan managed to stay around? A mix of modernization while holding some of their history and uniqueness. De Halve Maan showed that the beers they offered have changed over time and that where once they malted their own barley (seeing the malting room and kiln were great parts of the tour) they now have it malted by a huge malting company. While continuing to make ales with belgian yeast character, they have adopted their beers over time, to the point where their top seller currently is a Belgian pale ale using hops from the Czech Republic.
The third brewery we visited was the biggest blast from the past. Built in 1900 Cantillon brewery still uses the equipment and practices utilized over a century ago. Only one beer is brewed: a lambic with 65% barley, 35% barley, a lot of 3 year old aged hops and water. This beer is then aged in oak barrels (we tried some of the 20 month old, still version straight from the barrel) and is either blended with 1, 2 and 3 year old versions (Geuze) or the 2 year old version is mixed with fruit (cherries for kriek, raspberries for rose gambrinus, apricots for fou foune). Cantillon is the only lambic producer remaining in the city of Brussels and they remain profitable by sticking to this style.
The three breweries were very different yet each had consistently stuck to their image of what beer should be and how it should be made with Heineken always using the most modern microbiology and marketing techniques, Cantillon the most classic processes and De Halve Maan moving forwards while holding on to their geographical style and past.
While the breweries were great, I made it a point to drink at least 1 beer every day of the trip and have one local beer from every region visited. This taught me two valuable things:
1. Real Ales (especially very sessionable bitters) are very common, tasty but also expensive. These 3-4% ABV beers typically cost around 5 GBP (about $8).
2. Trappist (and Trappist style and lambic) beers in Belgium are extremely common (most restaurants seemed to offer a handful of each of these styles) and are extremely cheap. It is about the same cost for Rochefort, Westmalle, Chimay, Duvel and Cantillon in beer shops and bars as it is for Heineken, Hoegaarden and Stella Artois! Suffice it to say I LOVED Belgium and the problem was much more often too many beers to choose from than not enough. I had my fill of a number of Geuzes. In that arena Cantillon came in second to Drie Fonteinen in my book with a slight lead over Boon and Tilquin and way better than Oud Beersel. As for Trappists I liked Chimay more than I remembered but also enjoyed Rochefort a lot (wasn't a huge fan of La Trappe or Westmalle) and brought a Westy 12 and Achel home so I can try the only two trappists I'm yet to have experienced.
While I could write books and books about my trip, European beer or even just Belgian beer I think that's more than enough for one blog post.
Saturday, September 22, 2012
Posting from Europe
Three days into our Europe trip and I've managed to have beer every day. One thing I wanted to note was the prevalence of "real ales" (I the the name, all top fermented beers are real ales in my mind, but I digress) these cask conditioned hand pulled session beers are quite tasty and unlike what I came to expect of esb's in the us with a much more refreshing malt balance. Tonight I am drinking a kronenbourg in Paris after a long walking tour of the beautiful city. Looking forward to more exploring and more beers.
Saturday, September 8, 2012
Brett Saison (Funky Kast #1)
I brewed a Wheat Saison with Brett on 8-4-2012. The recipe was influenced somewhat by the great brett'd saison's I've had recently including Sofie by Goose Island and some of the beers from Stillwater Artisinal Ales. A very simple recipe, I hope to let the brett derived flavors shine through. I also plan to move half the batch into secondary with asian pears harvested from my girlfriend's yard and some oak cubes.
8-26-12 Update
Took a sample today, the beer is already down to an astounding 1.006. The small sample tasted good, with a light hoppy and fruity aroma and taste with surprisingly high sweetness for such a low gravity. I plan to bottle/rack to secondary within a few weeks if the gravity is stable.
10-7-12 Update
Bottled 30 bottles of this batch today, moved the rest of the batch into my 3 gallon better bottle with Asian pears and .5 oz. Hungarian oak.
4-1-13 Update
Double tasting with both the straight and oak/Asian pear versions.
![]() |
Goose Island may have sold out to AB InBev but they still make at least one interesting and delicious brew. |
8-26-12 Update
Took a sample today, the beer is already down to an astounding 1.006. The small sample tasted good, with a light hoppy and fruity aroma and taste with surprisingly high sweetness for such a low gravity. I plan to bottle/rack to secondary within a few weeks if the gravity is stable.
10-7-12 Update
Bottled 30 bottles of this batch today, moved the rest of the batch into my 3 gallon better bottle with Asian pears and .5 oz. Hungarian oak.
4-1-13 Update
Double tasting with both the straight and oak/Asian pear versions.
7-11-14
Nearly two years since brewing and more than a year after my initial tasting I just opened another bottle of this one. Bottle is highly carbonated, but not overly so, especially given the style. Appearance is a pretty red with a fast fading, lace leaving head. Smell is pear, apricot, peach, vanilla, wheat berry. Taste is wheat and stone fruit with a touch of light phenol. Finishes sweet and fruity with a moderate body. Overall this beer seems remarkably unchanged and, if I didn't know better, I may have guessed this was the oak and fruit version, the pairing was very well matche for the base. Not my favorite beer and the Brett really never showed through, but something different and enjoyable enough on a warm summer night.
Monday, August 27, 2012
Lime hefeweizen Tasting #1
I brewed up an all grain hefeweizen a while back. Though I used a couple types of wheat it had a fairly simple, classic bill. I bottled half of it straight and it's a drinkable, though very mild, hefe without any thrills. The second half however I added roughly half a container (about .75 quarts) of Simply Lime limeade to.
Appearance: With all the wheat this beer pours with a big head and (purposely) cloudy.
Smell: The nose is yeasty and doughy with just a little hint of citrus and banana.
Taste: The flavor is fairly tart with the lime the dominant flavor and the other flavors backing it up.
Overall: This is somewhere in the middle of those I've made in terms of quality, with no major flaws and a refreshing quality, but without the hefe characteristics or malt-to-fruit balance I would have liked. I could see this going over well with ladies and those who are less into beer and it's certainly quaffable.
Appearance: With all the wheat this beer pours with a big head and (purposely) cloudy.
Smell: The nose is yeasty and doughy with just a little hint of citrus and banana.
Taste: The flavor is fairly tart with the lime the dominant flavor and the other flavors backing it up.
Overall: This is somewhere in the middle of those I've made in terms of quality, with no major flaws and a refreshing quality, but without the hefe characteristics or malt-to-fruit balance I would have liked. I could see this going over well with ladies and those who are less into beer and it's certainly quaffable.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Experimentation
I like to experiment with my brewing. Many brewers don't understand the desire to try new styles, split batches, add fruit, spices, oak, smoke or whatever else to beers. Personally I would be bored to death to follow someone else's recipe and get someone else's results. There are two great rewards to experimentation.
1. Experience- when I experiment I can really see how beer works, what I like, and where to go in future batches.
2. Variety- I don't want to just make a pale ale that's as good as one from the store I want to make beers that are better and different from those I can buy.
Experimentation isn't just something that keeps me brewing beers, it keeps me drinking them. While many beer drinkers will primarily stick to a few key brands I usually go for a new one to try when possible. When I do find beers I like I go back to them on occasion (like how I plan to rebrew my hoppy black saison soon) but they also inspire me to keep experimenting both with the commercial beers I purchase and the homebrews I make. While I hope to brew some more "to style" beers in the future I will be sure to experiment within the limited range of those styles. After all some brewers have made a living off of experimenting.
1. Experience- when I experiment I can really see how beer works, what I like, and where to go in future batches.
2. Variety- I don't want to just make a pale ale that's as good as one from the store I want to make beers that are better and different from those I can buy.
Experimentation isn't just something that keeps me brewing beers, it keeps me drinking them. While many beer drinkers will primarily stick to a few key brands I usually go for a new one to try when possible. When I do find beers I like I go back to them on occasion (like how I plan to rebrew my hoppy black saison soon) but they also inspire me to keep experimenting both with the commercial beers I purchase and the homebrews I make. While I hope to brew some more "to style" beers in the future I will be sure to experiment within the limited range of those styles. After all some brewers have made a living off of experimenting.
Sunday, August 5, 2012
Peated porter
I recently brewed an extract porter with specialty grains. While the bulk of the bill was just dumping my remaining grains (chocolate, black patent, American roasted barley, carared, special b) in to a light base extract I did add one new grain I had purchased. Peated malt (also called peat smoked malt) is a malted barley that has been dried with smoke from burning peat (a type of moss).
Peat malt is not traditional to any style of beer (as many style snobs will quickly point out) but is classically used in Scotch whiskey, particularly those from the isle of Islay. It is known to give a harsh smoked flavor as well as briny and medicinal characteristics. Smoke, clove and medicinal (some say band-aid like) flavors all come from various phenols and can be pleasant or ruinous depending on the type, amount and personal tastes.
In this beer I hope to have a noticeable but not unbearable amount of smoke and peatiness. 5 ounces is higher than some recommend but hopefully is not too much. Depending on the results I will likely brew a future smoked porter (and other smoked beers) with other types of smoked malt (rauchmalt, cherrywood smoked, oak smoked wheat, etc...) in addition or in place of the peated.
Peat malt is not traditional to any style of beer (as many style snobs will quickly point out) but is classically used in Scotch whiskey, particularly those from the isle of Islay. It is known to give a harsh smoked flavor as well as briny and medicinal characteristics. Smoke, clove and medicinal (some say band-aid like) flavors all come from various phenols and can be pleasant or ruinous depending on the type, amount and personal tastes.
In this beer I hope to have a noticeable but not unbearable amount of smoke and peatiness. 5 ounces is higher than some recommend but hopefully is not too much. Depending on the results I will likely brew a future smoked porter (and other smoked beers) with other types of smoked malt (rauchmalt, cherrywood smoked, oak smoked wheat, etc...) in addition or in place of the peated.
8-04-12 Update
Bottled this up finally. I broke my hydrometer before getting a reading so I don't know the FG. The flat beer that I tasted was a bit sweet and mildly peaty. I'm not sure how this one is going to come out, the flavor of the peat seemed mild but interesting and first, but built over time to a strange and unbearable taste that overwhelmed the rest of the flavor. Hopefully this effect will be lessened with a little carbonation and time.
8-26-12 Update
Tried a bottle today, very low carbonation and head retention is the first thing I notice. Very sweet and pretty peaty. The peat was overbearing at first, then subsided, then built up again to the point of unbearable. I'm hoping with a few more months (or years) the flavors will meld better but right now it is pretty much just sweet and peaty in a bad way.
10-11-12
My dad drank some of these with the review "It's kind of weird by itself, but with barbecue it's really, really good." I'll have to try the combination but I could definitely see the sweet and smokey character of this being good with bbq or even good in a marinade or sauce.
Friday, August 3, 2012
Cleaning Bottles
I've said it before and I'm sure I'll say it again, cleaning bottles is the worst part of my brewing process. As much as people condemn bottling in favor of kegging I've always liked aspects of bottling (it's cheap, they're portable, the bottling itself is fairly straightforward and easy) but hated one aspect: cleaning bottles.
While part of my reason for cleaning bottles is to get the labels off the more important, time consuming and frustrating part is cleaning the interior which can have black mold and beer dregs stuck to the bottom. It usually takes me around 4 hours of letting them soak in a an oxiclean/hot water bath before 1-2 minutes per bottle of scrubbing before they get to my liking. For today's bottle cleaning session of 150+ bottles that means approximately 4 hours of active bottle cleaning time.
I might just buy new bottles from now on whenever I or others don't wash them out after use to avoid the mold.
While part of my reason for cleaning bottles is to get the labels off the more important, time consuming and frustrating part is cleaning the interior which can have black mold and beer dregs stuck to the bottom. It usually takes me around 4 hours of letting them soak in a an oxiclean/hot water bath before 1-2 minutes per bottle of scrubbing before they get to my liking. For today's bottle cleaning session of 150+ bottles that means approximately 4 hours of active bottle cleaning time.
I might just buy new bottles from now on whenever I or others don't wash them out after use to avoid the mold.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Wild/Sour/Funky Processes
I've been studying different types of wild beers a lot recently but am yet to have committed to brewing one or what style I want to start with. I am by no means an expert having tasted only a few and brewed none, but this seems like a good place to compile some of the research I have done.
I wish there were a better term than "wild" (as a true wild beer would, in my mind, refer to one made with local, self caught yeast) but many beers are often called wild because they use living components other than traditional brewers yeast (Saccharomyces) and are typically made with Brettanomyces (so called "wild" yeast) and potentially bacteria (notably Lactobacillus and Pediococcus) or because they share traits with beers which do have these microorganisms. There are many variations on what a "sour" or "funky" or "wild" beer is and for the sake of this article I will simply call them all "wild" as not all the beers I am referring to taste sour and many (even some made with Brettanomyces) do not taste "funky", while some beers that do not contain these traditional organisms (or acids) can taste sour or funky. While there are some classic styles known for their sour or funky qualities there are many wild beers being made today (and traditionally) which do not fall into easily defined categories. Instead of talking about styles I just wish to write about some methods of creating these types of beers that are commonly employed:
1. Adding (lactic) acid: Adding acid, usually lactic though I suppose others (malic or acetic for example) could be used, seems to be the least "craft" method of making a sour and might feel more like an industrial process or even "cheating" to some people. This is utilized by brewers sometimes alone or in combination with other methods to create a sour beer. As it sounds this process simply uses food grade acid, which can be added to the mash to lower pH or can be added at other stages for sour beers.
2. Sour Mash: A sour mash is achieved by adding raw grain to wort which has not had yeast added to it. The grain is covered in Lactobacillus (among other things) causing a quick souring of the beer. This can also be achieved, among other ways, by adding cultured Lacto. or with a yogurt culture. Brewer's utilizing this method typically hold the Lactobacillus innoculated wort at a warm but not hot temperature then add to the mash of the final beer to heat the wort after a few days of souring to kill any yeast and bugs and stabilize the sourness level. Anywhere from 10% to 100% of the wort can be soured in this manner, giving varied results.
3. Sour Malt: Sour malt, also known as sauermalz and acidulated malt, is a malt which is covered with lactic acid, hence lowering the pH of a beer it is mashed in. This can be used in non-sour type beers to slightly adjust the pH, as the sole provider of sourness if used in large amounts, or in combination with other methods to form sour beer. In most respects this process isn't much different from adding straight lactic acid in the end.
4. Pitching Brettanomyces without Saccharomyces: This process can be done with Brettanomyces as the sole yeast in which case a subtle fruity yeast character with flavors closer to a beer brewed without "wild" ingredients is produced.
5. Pitching bacteria (Lactobacillus) without Saccharomyces: This process is utilized sometimes by select craft breweries and homebrewers. This is most commonly used in small beers, most notably some Berliner Weisses. This method needs specialized (heterofermentative) bacteria which produce both lactic acid and alcohol and can survive conditions enough to fully attenuate the beer themselves.
6. Pitching in addition to Saccharomyces: This is the most traditional and probably the most common method of sour productions and is typically used to make all 6 of the BJCP approved sour styles. Whether added in primary or secondary (or traditionally as ambient yeast which are in the air/wood/fruit added to the beer) the idea here is typically to have the Sacc utilize simple sugars while Bugs and/or Brett work on more complex sugars and other side components to generate strong flavors ranging from tropical fruit, horse, goat and farmyard funk characteristics found derived from Brett to the tart and tangy flavors from Lacto to the biting, vinegary qualities from Acetobacter.
Hopefully I will soon have ventured into the world of funky and sour beers as I recently bought two yeast packages which come with additions to sacc:
White Labs American Farmhouse: A proprietary blend of belgian yeast and brett. I hope to make a brett saison somewhat similar to Goose Island's Sophie.
Roeselare Blend: This is essentially a lambic blend with various lacto and brett strains in addition to sacc. I plan to brew a sour brown ale with this pack, allowing it to age for upwards of a year.
I wish there were a better term than "wild" (as a true wild beer would, in my mind, refer to one made with local, self caught yeast) but many beers are often called wild because they use living components other than traditional brewers yeast (Saccharomyces) and are typically made with Brettanomyces (so called "wild" yeast) and potentially bacteria (notably Lactobacillus and Pediococcus) or because they share traits with beers which do have these microorganisms. There are many variations on what a "sour" or "funky" or "wild" beer is and for the sake of this article I will simply call them all "wild" as not all the beers I am referring to taste sour and many (even some made with Brettanomyces) do not taste "funky", while some beers that do not contain these traditional organisms (or acids) can taste sour or funky. While there are some classic styles known for their sour or funky qualities there are many wild beers being made today (and traditionally) which do not fall into easily defined categories. Instead of talking about styles I just wish to write about some methods of creating these types of beers that are commonly employed:
1. Adding (lactic) acid: Adding acid, usually lactic though I suppose others (malic or acetic for example) could be used, seems to be the least "craft" method of making a sour and might feel more like an industrial process or even "cheating" to some people. This is utilized by brewers sometimes alone or in combination with other methods to create a sour beer. As it sounds this process simply uses food grade acid, which can be added to the mash to lower pH or can be added at other stages for sour beers.
2. Sour Mash: A sour mash is achieved by adding raw grain to wort which has not had yeast added to it. The grain is covered in Lactobacillus (among other things) causing a quick souring of the beer. This can also be achieved, among other ways, by adding cultured Lacto. or with a yogurt culture. Brewer's utilizing this method typically hold the Lactobacillus innoculated wort at a warm but not hot temperature then add to the mash of the final beer to heat the wort after a few days of souring to kill any yeast and bugs and stabilize the sourness level. Anywhere from 10% to 100% of the wort can be soured in this manner, giving varied results.
3. Sour Malt: Sour malt, also known as sauermalz and acidulated malt, is a malt which is covered with lactic acid, hence lowering the pH of a beer it is mashed in. This can be used in non-sour type beers to slightly adjust the pH, as the sole provider of sourness if used in large amounts, or in combination with other methods to form sour beer. In most respects this process isn't much different from adding straight lactic acid in the end.
4. Pitching Brettanomyces without Saccharomyces: This process can be done with Brettanomyces as the sole yeast in which case a subtle fruity yeast character with flavors closer to a beer brewed without "wild" ingredients is produced.
5. Pitching bacteria (Lactobacillus) without Saccharomyces: This process is utilized sometimes by select craft breweries and homebrewers. This is most commonly used in small beers, most notably some Berliner Weisses. This method needs specialized (heterofermentative) bacteria which produce both lactic acid and alcohol and can survive conditions enough to fully attenuate the beer themselves.
6. Pitching in addition to Saccharomyces: This is the most traditional and probably the most common method of sour productions and is typically used to make all 6 of the BJCP approved sour styles. Whether added in primary or secondary (or traditionally as ambient yeast which are in the air/wood/fruit added to the beer) the idea here is typically to have the Sacc utilize simple sugars while Bugs and/or Brett work on more complex sugars and other side components to generate strong flavors ranging from tropical fruit, horse, goat and farmyard funk characteristics found derived from Brett to the tart and tangy flavors from Lacto to the biting, vinegary qualities from Acetobacter.
Hopefully I will soon have ventured into the world of funky and sour beers as I recently bought two yeast packages which come with additions to sacc:
White Labs American Farmhouse: A proprietary blend of belgian yeast and brett. I hope to make a brett saison somewhat similar to Goose Island's Sophie.
Roeselare Blend: This is essentially a lambic blend with various lacto and brett strains in addition to sacc. I plan to brew a sour brown ale with this pack, allowing it to age for upwards of a year.
Labels:
beer,
brettanomyces,
lactobacillus,
Sour beer,
wild
Friday, July 6, 2012
Hoppy Black Saison Recipe and Tasting #1 (and only)
I brewed up my first Hoppy Black Saison at the end of March. The recipe was intended to combine two styles I greatly enjoy: Saison and Black IPA. It was also intended to be a simple extract recipe using up some of the grains I had sitting around. I should note that part of the reason this took me so long to write is that every time I sit down to do a tasting of these I've suddenly drank 3 or 4 and am in no state to write about them.
Tasting:
Appearance- Extremely dark brown, usually looking opaque and black but in thinner glasses/sections a bit of light shines through. It pours with an off white medium thick head of about half an inch. Really the right look for a black IPA.
Smell- The first thing that hits is a clean citrus with notes of earth, coffee, chocolate and smoke underneath. Again this one is right where I would like it to be. Good start.
Taste- Again the first thing to come through is a fruity citrus flavor that seems to be equal parts hops and yeast derivatives (and maybe a touch of the orange peel I used) and the slight funky earthiness I associate with saisons. This is followed with roast, black cherries and pit fruits with a sweet and chocolaty middle that seems to come from the porter-esque ingredients and the Special B. The finish is just bitter enough (seemingly coming from both the roasted barley and the hops) to balance this sweetness but doesn't meet anywhere near IPA levels (though it does seem on par with some of my favorite black IPA's). There is occasionally a black pepper like sensation but only just enough to make me search for it.
Mouthfeel- Crisp carbonation with medium body puts this one a bit on the heavier side of IPA's and certainly Saisons but still thinner than most porters. I may like the attenuation to finish a bit higher but honestly it goes down well as is.
Drinkability/Overall- This is the best beer I've ever made and one of the most drinkable I've ever had. The complexity of hop/yeast/roast is really intriguing but none of it is overpowering, the elements all play very well together. This beer began as an attempt to use up some grains and try to make something really out of the box, both were achieved magnificently. Like the dark saison reviews I've seen on The Mad Fermentationist there is really so much going on that it is hard to tell where exactly each element arrives from (is the citrus from the orange peel, hops or yeast? The cherry/dried fruit flavor from Special B, yeast or a combination of thing?) which makes it really exciting to me. This one is already gone (I went to grab one on 4th of July and got pretty sad when I noticed there weren't any left) and will be a beer that I will DEFINITELY be brewing again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)