Cherry Tree - Smoked Lagers

I’ve probably had the idea of making a beer that uses both cherries and cherrywood smoked malt for over a decade but never actually went through with it. After purchasing 10 pounds of cherrywood smoked malt nearly a year ago and only using a pound of it in my Smoked Helles, I finally decided to take the plunge. For this recipe I decided to go with a super simple SMaSH recipe: 9 lbs Sugar Creek cherrywood smoked malt, 1 oz. hallertau mittelfruh, and a lager yeast. I only added the cherry fruit to part of this beer at secondary in order to have both a fruited and unfruited version.

Tasting:

Unfruited Version:

Appearance: Pours a nice light golden color, with a white medium sized head that fades somewhat quickly but leaves a small solid layer (the photo is about 5 minutes after pouring). Slightly hazy, not entirely surprising with a bottle conditioned beer and I may have not poured quite as cleanly as I could.

Aroma: The sweet, fruity, and phenolic notes that I associate with cherrywood smoke stand out but this is a fairly subtly smoked beer compared to many rauchbiers. Light grainy and honey malt sweetness from the malt and a very low note of sulfur from the yeast also appear. Not surprisingly the hops aren’t noticeable on the nose.

Taste: Sweet neutral malt leads the way followed by moderate smoky phenols and some fruitiness from the smoke. Finish is just lightly bitter with a lingering fairly light smoke character. Some would definitely find this very smoky but compared to other smoked beers it isn't very strong.

Mouthfeel: Medium low in body with medium carbonation, could maybe be a little more carbonated but I like it for this beer. The smoke phenols seem to linger and tingle the tongue and pull at the back of the throat a bit in the finish and aftertaste but I find it more refreshing than off-putting.

Overall: I’m extremely happy with this beer. The smoke is noticeable but not overpowering and I find it extremely drinkable and thirst quenching. I lost track of taking notes during this tasting as I kept just going back for more. The cherrywood smoked malt from Sugar Creek might be the least smoky smoked malt I’ve used but the character it does have is very enjoyable. This is the 4th time I’ve made some version of a smoked helles using cherrywood malt and it’s pretty clear why I keep coming back to that idea - it’s tasty. That said, less of the smoke character, a slightly thinner body, and a touch more carbonation would put this more in line with what I want out of a lightly smoked pale lager.

Fruited on the left, unfruited on the right

Cherry Fruited Version:

Appearance: Slightly orange/pink tint from the cherries. Head was very small and white and quickly faded to just a small ring. Haze is a touch higher than the unfruited version though that may have just been this pour.

Aroma: Light cherry is the dominant note. While the fruit isn’t strong the smoke is much subtler than in the unfruited version and I have to search hard for it. The light cherry aroma also seems to block the yeast and malt derived aromas as well, though I can just find some grainy sweetness when really trying. As it warms the fruity cherry aroma shows up more and more and phenolic smoke fades even further.

Taste: Moderate cherry flavor fills the mouth. Finish is lingering with just a touch of bitterness and phenolic character. While the cherry character isn’t strong it seems to dominate everything else and what does come through seems more like an off note to the cherry than smoke. The aftertaste has a strange tongue coating sensation that is likely the phenols but there still isn’t a smoky taste.

Mouthfeel: Similar medium level of body as the unfruited version but with a little less carbonation. This is probably due to using the same amount of priming sugar in this batch despite it being slightly larger. Higher carbonation would probably improve a few things, including the head and the ability for the smoke and fruit to pop more, but it’s not totally flat.

Overall: Not bad in any way and for a weird beer experiment that’s probably a win but this one doesn’t quite work. The fruit doesn’t so much compete with the smoke as the cherry flavor subdues any smoke into submission, making it seem more like a slightly strange cherry beer than a smoked beer with cherries. If I were to attempt this again I would likely use less cherries per gallon and/or a more prominent smoked malt. Using both more fruit (cherries or otherwise) and a much smokier malt (e.g. the stjordal style malt) might also be a fun experiment.

12/17/22 Brewday:

Ran into some issues milling as the battery on my drill overheated at one point, then the battery died after cooling down and had to be recharged. Dealing with this caused me to spill some grain and likely caused a slightly higher amount of the malt bill than usual to go uncrushed. Last pound or so of grains were milled and added once the battery had recharged, about 10 minutes after the initial mash in.

Treated 5 gallons water with a quarter campden tablet. Mashed in initially at 148F before adding boiling water about 5 minutes later to raise mash temp to 157F. Temp had fallen to 150F after an hour which is more of a drop than usual but I added some of the grain later, it’s cold out, and I stirred several times. First runnings gave 3.5 gallons wort with gravity measuring 1.051.

Batch sparged with 3 gallons campden treated water at ~120F giving 1.020 second runnings and a combined 6.5 gallons at 1.041

Wort had moderate smoke and barnyard aromas, not nearly as strong as when I made the 100% Stjordal smoked beer and with a very different character of barnyard, fruit, and breakfast cereal in addition to phenolic spicy smoke.

Ran into a few issues during the brewday, including the propane running out at some point during the boil when I wasn’t watching so I boiled for an additional 15 minutes after switching tanks.

After cooling to 60F the wort was transferred to a 6 gallon carboy and placed in a chest freezer set to 50F with the temperature gauge attached to the outside of the carboy. After 3 hours the temperature probe was reading 50F and I pitched a pack (12g) of Cellar Science "German" dry yeast which I have not used before but appears to be their version of W-34/70.

12/18/22: Increased temperature to 53 as there haven't been any real signs of fermentation after nearly 48 hours.

12/19/22: Still no real signs of fermentation more than 48 hours after pitching and I'm a little worried. The yeast packet recommended rehydrating, which I didn't do, and also recommends fermentation temperature of 54-62°F which is higher than it has been for most of the past few days. Gravity sample shows it is down to 1.040 which is down from the original gravity that was around 1.050. Increased chest freezer temperature to 55F to try and get it to really kick off fermentation. Taste of the gravity sample is good, fairly strong but not overly overpowering or phenolic in the smoke character but also with a lot of sweetness that needs to ferment out. Will be interesting to see how this one changes once fermentation really kicks in.

12/20/22: After a night at the slightly higher temperatures a nice layer of krausen and airlock activity show that this one is fermenting strongly now. Dropped the temperature by a degree to 54F, plan to slowly drop it further over the next week.

12/21/22: Dropped temperature to 52F. Still fermenting strongly.

12/22/22: Dropped temperature to 50F. Still showing strong signs of fermentation. Gravity reading at 1.028.

12/23/22: moved out of chest freezer to an area of the basement near a door where temperatures are measuring between the upper 50s and low 60s. Plan to leave for diacetyl rest/completion of primary fermentation before returning to the chest freezer for lagering.

12/29/22: 

Cherry version on the left, still transferring unfruited version on the right

Racked about half of the batch onto 3 lbs of Oregon Red Tart Cherry puree in a 3 gallon carboy and the remainder into a separate 3 gallon carboy. Plain version was placed in fridge at 32F to lager while the other version was left at room temperature to allow full fermentation of the fruit.

1/16/23

Racked unfruited version into bottling bucket with 1.8 oz table sugar boiled in 1/4 cup water. First time bottling in nearly a year and first time using a bottling bucket in as long as I could remember.

1/26/23

Followed the same bottling process as the unfruited for the fruited version. Tasting pretty nice with noticeable but not intense Cherry and drying phenolic smoke still coming through. Cracked open a bottle of the unfruited version - undercarbonated and still a touch sweet but very enjoyable with only moderate phenolics at this point. Will be interesting to taste both side by side once carbonated.

2/6/23: Brought a bottle of each to a bottle share where they were both pretty well received.

3/7/23: Tasting notes above.

4/2/23: The unfruited version of this beer received a 36 and placed first in the Wood and Smoke beer category at the DC Homebrewers Cherry Blossom Competition. I'm not entirely shocked to see this do well as a Smoked Helles in a BJCP competition, it was tasty, clean, and with a noticeable but not abrasive smoke character. One judge noted that more breadiness would help with the balance, and I think they have a good point and will likely use some Vienna malt in addition to less smoked malt the next time I make a smoked helles.

5/3/23: This beer didn't place in the Smoke, Historic & Wood Beer category of the BURP Spirit of Free Beer competition scoring a 20!? :The scoresheets don't really make sense, claiming a clorophenol(?) character that I don't get at all. While this beer is smokey for a smoked helles, and definitely has some smoke phenols, it is not an extremely smokey beer (like the Stjordalsol was) and I also don't get any of the faults the judges noted. It's tough when entering a beer in these types of styles because some people's taste thresholds are very different, as seen by the polar opposite scores this beer received in the two competitions. It's possible the beer is dropping off in quality after a few months but after having a bottle tonight I would still consider it very good.

10/27/23: had a bottle of the unfruited version for the first time in a while and it is still really drinkable. It has also gotten extremely clear at this point, by far the clearest bottle conditioned beer I’ve made. Really a nice beer that I may brew again at some point, even if I go closer to my regular smoked helles next time.

Smoked Helles '22

Smoked Helles has become my go to spring beer since first brewing a split batch that included it several years ago. This year I got a later start on it than usual but still wanted to get one going to have it on tap for the summer. Something about the low levels of bitterness, moderate crackery and bready malt, and a noticeable sweet smoke character from cherrywood smoked malt makes this one a refreshing drinker in the warm weather. It will be interesting to see how the Sugar Creek smoked malt compares to the Briess that I've used in previous versions.

Simple smoked helles:

75% (7.5 lbs) Pilsner malt (Weyermann)

10% (1 lb) Cherrywood Smoked Malt (Sugar Creek)

10% (1 lb) CaraHell (Weyermann)

5% (.5 lbs) Vienna Malt (Weyermann)

Tasting Notes:

Smell: light sweet caramel and honey like malts up front. The smoke comes through more as I drink but is fairly restrained and enjoyable giving notes of fruity sweetness and a touch of pork barbecue. No noticeable yeast or hop derived aromas.

Appearance: bright gold with a large fluffy white head. Probably a little too much carbonation making the head larger than intended but it works. The head fades fairly quickly to a thin layer but that thin layer then lasts throughout. Clarity isn't crystal clear but very good given that there were no filtrations or finings used.

Taste: leads with a lightly sweet and grainy malt character giving cracker, bread, and breakfast cereal notes that then wash slowly into a mild sweet and very lightly smokey flavor that lasts through a light but refreshing bitterness.

Mouthfeel: dry and crisp. Carbonation is maybe just a touch high but this drinks very well. Body is just the right level to let the flavors hit the entire mouth before fading away.

Overall: a very enjoyable and refreshing beer that I could happily drink multiple half liters of. The smoke is fairly low but I go back and forth on whether I would like it to be higher. Any less and it should be left out entirely but any higher and it might dominate some of the subtler character that makes the beer so enjoyable and refreshing. Even with how much I like to tweak my brews I could definitely see making this exact same recipe again with no changes. This one is probably in the top 10 beers I’ve brewed but probably wouldn’t make my top 5.

5/11/22
Planned out a vacation day to recover from the previous night's awesome The Menzingers show and brew a beer.

Mill had a couple rusty spots. Attempted to clean but couldn’t fully get them off, hopefully it doesn’t come off/carry through in the beer.

Mash started at 154 but fell to 148 by end. Mashed out with 1 gallon at 180F, ran off then batch sparged with water at 180F to reach 6.5 gallons.

Surprisingly little smoke smell during runoff. Maybe I should have upped the amount of smoked malt but at least I have 9 more pounds left to work with.

Brought to boil and added 1 oz Hallertau Mittelfruh hops and boiled for 60 minutes with an addition of Irish moss at 10 minutes. Chilled with immersion chiller to below 80F, transferred to 6 gallon plastic carboy and placed in kegerator at 45F.

After 7 hours pitched one jar of Munich lager yeast previously used for Maibock.

12 hours after pitching (19 after brewing) increased chest freezer temp to 50F. Added 1 pack of Lallemand Diamond Lager Yeast 8 hours later.

5/13/22
After 48 hours still not seeing any signs of active fermentation so increasing chest freezer temp to 55F

5/22/22
Still slowly fermenting with a decent krausen, increased chest freezer temp to 60F

5/27/22
Fermentation looks complete with just a few yeast rafts on top. Began slowly cooling.

6/12/22
After about 2 weeks at 30F the beer is still looking similar with some small yeast rafts but seems to be clearing up and looks ready for packaging soon. Gravity measurement shows it down to 1.011. Taste is fairly clean but a touch lighter on the smoke than I would like and maybe a little thinner/more watery, but both might improve with carbonation and warmer serving temperature. Will likely keg sometime in the next week.

6/17/22
Transferred to keg and set in chest freezer at 50F.

6/19/22
Poured a small sample tasting. Surprisingly clean, the smoke just barely shows up in the nose when I search for it, otherwise taste and smell is mostly clean with light herbal and honey character. I would probably use at least twice this much smoked malt, possibly more, if making this recipe with the same ingredients again. Not bad but closer to a plain helles than a smoked anything.

7/15/22
Tasting day with notes above. After about a month in the keg this one is quite nice. Interested to see what 9 pounds of the smoked malt does on its own given how subtle it is at 10% of a batch. It seems to be a bit more subtle than other cherrywood smoked malts I've used but has a very nice character to it.

Alder Wood Smoked Beer(s)

I was recently extremely intrigued and inspired by the Chop and Brew episode on a beer made with 100% alder smoked malt. While I had kept up with Lars Garshol's blog for years, I had not thought a lot about Norwegian farmhouse styles since brewing a few beers with kveik a few years ago and had fallen behind on my reading. For one thing, I missed that Lars had released a book. For another, I missed how readily available many strains of kveik had become. Maybe what surprised me the most about the video though, was how there was suddenly the ability to buy malts made in the traditional Stjørdal style in the U.S. Within a day or two of watching the video I had placed an order with Sugar Creek Malt Co. and ordered Traditional Farmhouse Techniques so that I could set out on making a beer in this style for myself.

The book arrived first and it did not disappoint. An absolute page turner of history, culture, techniques, and ideas that, despite having read Lars' blog for years, felt new and exciting. I would easily put it in the top few beer/homebrewing books that I've ever read and feel that the information included, and the writing quality in terms of both style and clarity, are top notch. I tore through the book cover to cover and plan to go back to it again regularly.

Mash hops and the (non-traditional) juniper berries about to be added

When the malt arrived I was finally ready to make a Stjørdalsøl inspired beer and put together a very simple recipe of 9.5 lbs Stjørdal malt from Sugar Creek, 1.5 lbs of white sugar, and 1 oz of Hallertau Mittelfrüh. One half of the batch was fermented with a kveik strain (in this case Omega's Voss Kveik), making it (hopefully) close to a traditional Norwegian style. I had originally planned to ferment the other half with a lager yeast to make it closer to a traditional German Rauchbier to give myself a reference point for the flavor of the smoked malt, but after reading the book I was inspired to instead go with a Baltic (specifically Lithuanian) yeast strain in an effort to emulate a historical Gotlandsdricke. While Gotlandsdricke is a fairly different, and very geographically distinct, style it shares some commonalities in that it is a dark, smoked, farmhouse beer often made with juniper that was historically made with a farmhouse yeast so while this recipe might be farther from that style it should be in the ballpark. I had also wanted to try out the Jovaru yeast since it was first released but had not yet had an opportunity. Perhaps the most inauthentic part of this recipe was the use of Juniper berries rather than branches, but it was the closest thing I could easily procure and with the smoked malt being such a driver of the flavor I'm hopeful this won't cause a huge departure from the true flavors of these styles.

9.5 of the 10 pounds were used in this recipe
with the hope to save the last half pound for a future brew

Beautiful light brown color on the smoked
malt and a huge aroma that fills the room

Tasting Notes:

Appearance: Medium brown, very clear. Off white head of thick bubbles is thin but lasts for a while.

Smell: This one explodes out of the bottle with aroma: Very high levels of smoke reminiscent of campfires and smoked meats but also some medicinal and earthy/funky/farm-like aromas. There is some pine, wood, and a touch of toffee in the mix but it is mostly dominated by the smoke and phenol character.

Taste: Taste starts off with a toasty and sweet malt that it is quickly swept away with phenolic smoke. The smoke overwhelms and lingers but other subtle flavors show up throughout with moderate cherry-like fruit and some subtle pine and citrus peel. Finish is lightly piney and citrusy with plenty of smoke that lingers long after the sip.

Mouthfeel: Very low carbonation and moderate body give this a surprising creaminess. Drinks a bit like a cask beer and does not come off nearly as strong in alcohol as it is. No astringency though the smoke lingers in the mouth with the creaminess.

Overall: I'm not entirely sure this was what I envisioned this beer to taste like when reading or hearing descriptions of the style but I'm very glad I made it. The smoke is different and complex and interesting and the other characters seem to blend well. It's hard to know how much of the character comes from anything but the smoked malt but the yeast, hops, and juniper berries may have added a little of the fruit/pine/citrus complexity that work well. If this beer is at all close to the traditional style I can see why so many in the region are taking the effort to not only brew but also malt their grain, it's unlike anything else and extremely enjoyable. I don't know if I'll ever brew this exact recipe again but if I do the only things I would likely change would be to make it more traditional with juniper branches instead of berries and possibly removing the white sugar. I also would likely try a lager strain in place of the Jovaru version, but I should do a full tasting of that half before deciding.

1/29/22
Fittingly cold and snowy brew day for Nordic inspired beer(s). Milled 9.5 pounds of Stjørdal malt on my father's mill. Mashed in at 154F and added half an ounce each of hops and juniper berries. Ran off after an hour rest, added sugar to first runnings and stirred, then put on burner and began heating during sparge. Sparged at 180F, added second runnings to kettle and brought to boil. Added the second .5 oz. dose of hops after about 15 minutes of boiling then boiled for another 60 minutes before chilling. Chilled to low 80s, ran into two separate 3 gallon fermenters and pitched separate yeasts. Placed next to each other and wrapped in towels in a fairly cool basement; hopefully they can rip through fermentation before their temps fall too much.

2/6/22
Fermentation very slow if still active but still a thin krausen.

2/17/22
No noticeable fermentation, should probably be packaged by now but currently between houses and this is staying at my parents' house while my equipment is in storage.

3/2/22
Kegged in separate 3 gallon kegs. Taste of both pre-carbonation is very smokey and interesting. Camp fire, pine, cherry, and interesting fruitiness all come through in both with the "Gotlandsdricke" version being dryer and emphasizing the pine and a touch more spicy phenols. TBD whether I carbonate and serve on draft or transfer to bottles.

3/18/22
Bottled both halves. 2/3s of the Stjørdalsøl version was left with the very low (~5 PSI at room temperature) carbonation while the other 2/3s (labeled Stj) received one Cooper's carbonation drop. All of the Gotlandsdricke bottles (except for a couple of 12 oz bottles) received one carbonation drop.

3/23/22
Brought a bottle of each of the low carbonation versions to a DC Homebrewers meeting on 3/19 and one bottle of the low carbonated Voss version to a BADASS meeting. Very well received in terms of it being interesting but not a beer that everyone necessarily enjoyed. Both versions are aggressively smokey with some interesting pine and fruit character. I find the Voss/Stjørdalsøl version has more cherry and citrus while the Jovaru/Gotlandsdricke version is a touch drier and more phenolic, though some felt it was less smokey and very different from the Voss. The phenol level is so high that it occasionally comes across to me as medicinal and chloraseptic-like but in small pours the beer is highly interesting and enjoyable. Hoping to do a more thorough tasting in the future.

4/13/22
Tasting Night, tasting notes above. Tasting notes were done on a small bottle of the low carbonated version of the Voss/Stjørdalsøl version. I may revisit in the future with a higher carbonated bottle or the Gotlandsdricke/Jovaru version.

Belgian Golden Strong and Smoked Helles Parti-gyle

Just over 2 years ago I brewed a series of Belgians, including an interesting take on a Belgian Golden Strong. Belgian Golden Strong Ales (BGSAs) have been one of my favorite styles since the first time I tried Duvel Green on my 21st birthday and was opened to a whole new world of Belgian beer. With only one beer currently in my kegerator I decided I should throw together something that could be both interesting and refreshing now that spring is here. I also didn't want to solely commit to a BGSA and decided it would be a good time to perform a pseudo parti-gyle in order to get 2 different beers.

I decided that the smaller beer could be a good base for my third attempt at lagering since the kegerator/ferment chamber had space available. Playing around with the numbers I realized that by adding just a little pale malt, and some specialty malts I would be able to make a smoked Helles. While I haven't had a smoked Helles before, it seemed like another fitting beer for spring with a balance of both intriguing components and moderate drinkability.

I brewed the beers on the last day of winter in a cold mix of rain, sleet, and snow. While the weather added some difficulty and I didn't do everything quite as efficiently as I could have, the day went well overall and hopefully I'll come out of it with 2 tasty beers for only a couple hours more work than I would have had to do for 1. The addition of grains required a second mash and made this not a true parti-gyle but allowed me to give more variability to the beers produced and I plan to perform similar split batch procedures in the future. One goal moving forward will be to better line up the timing for the two batches to minimize how much additional time is required.

Designing the two recipes was a somewhat iterative process as I came up with a general idea for each recipe separately, then used a parti-gyle calculator to identify that I would need a 1.045 OG at 6 gallons, then came up with the overall malt bill, then went back and refined the individual recipes. the recipes shown below are my best attempt to show how to recreate the beers if not done together and have been adjusted slightly due to hitting higher efficiency than expected. The base malts used aren't traditional but I was making due with what I had including the last of my bags of Pilsner and 2-row and just enough Maris Otter to hit my required amounts.

Future Laws:
Belgian Golden Strong Ale

OG	1.083
FG	1.017
IBU	29
SRM	3
ABV	9%

Fermentables
Amount	Fermentable	Maltster	Use	PPG	Color
4.0 lb	2-Row (US)	Briess	Mash	37	1 °L
2.0 lb	Pilsner (DE)	Weyermann	Mash	37	1 °L
1.5 lb	Sucrose	N/A	Boil	46	0 °L
0.67 lb	Maris Otter Pale	Thomas Fawcett & Sons	Mash	38	3 °L

Hops
Amount	Hop	Time	Use	Form	AA
1.5 oz	Strisselspalt (FR)	45 min	Boil	Pellet	2.80%
1.5 oz	Strisselspalt (FR)	15 min	Boil	Pellet	2.80%

Yeast
Name	Lab/Product	Attenuation
Golden Pear Belgian	Gigayeast	80.00%

Mash steps
Step	Heat Source	Target Temp	Time
Saccharification Rest	Infusion	146.0 °F	30 min
Saccharification Rest	Infusion	154.0 °F	30 min

Of Greater Things:

Smoked Munich Helles

OG	1.054
FG	1.013
IBU	15
SRM	4
ABV	5.40%

Fermentables
Amount	Fermentable	Maltster	Use	PPG	Color
2.0 lb	Maris Otter Pale (UK)	Thomas Fawcett & Sons	Mash	38	3 °L
1.5 lb	Pilsner (DE)	Weyermann	Mash	37	1 °L
1.5 lb	2-Row (US)	Briess	Mash	37	1 °L
0.5 lb	CaraHell (DE)	Weyermann	Mash	34	11 °L
0.5 lb	Smoked Malt (US)	Briess	Mash	37	5 °L

Hops
Amount	Hop	Time	Use	Form	AA
1.0 oz	Strisselspalt (FR)	45 min	Boil	Pellet	2.80%

Yeast
Name	Lab/Product	Attenuation
German Lager Yeast	White Labs WLP830	76.50%
German Lager Yeast	White Labs WLP830	76.50%

In Grodz We Trust, #26 Tasting

About a month back I brewed my second smoked beer, a Gratzer (or Grodziskie in Polish) and American Wheat hybrid I call in Grodz we trust.  Classically using entirely or near entirely oak smoked wheat malt, Grodziskie has disappeared and made a bit of a resurgence with American craft versions popping up every now and then.  In my attempt I wanted only a slight bit of smokiness to blend in with a dry, dry hopped wheat beer base.

A- Pours a clear pretty yellow color which I chose to add the yeast to, giving a nice Hoegaarden like Wit color with constant carbonation bubble movement throughout.  Small head fades to a thin layer and leaves some lacing.

S- Similar to many of my other dry hopped beers as the Strisselspalt really shows up with light earth, spice, vegetal and fruity black currant aroma, just a touch of smoke mixed in.

T- The smoke takes center stage with a woody chargrilled character that is followed with earthy and spicy hops and a finish that is lightly bitter and still phenol smokey.

M- Very light, dry and thin with moderate carbonation.  This one is right where I was aiming for in terms of the mouthfeel.

O- This is a strange beer that is hard to pin down.  It's impossible for me to say how close it comes to a traditional Gratzer but I could see it being a popular beer among those who like smoked beers.  That said the moderate bitterness and hop aroma combined with the moderate smoke give a strange impression.  If I were to brew again I would likely cut the smoke in half to allow the hops to be more at the front or cut the smoke entirely and add more ginger to let the spice notes really play.  A drinkable, sessionable summer beer that will probably go great with grilling but certainly won't please most.

Peated porter

I recently brewed an extract porter with specialty grains. While the bulk of the bill was just dumping my remaining grains (chocolate, black patent, American roasted barley, carared, special b) in to a light base extract I did add one new grain I had purchased. Peated malt (also called peat smoked malt) is a malted barley that has been dried with smoke from burning peat (a type of moss).

Peat malt is not traditional to any style of beer (as many style snobs will quickly point out) but is classically used in Scotch whiskey, particularly those from the isle of Islay. It is known to give a harsh smoked flavor as well as briny and medicinal characteristics. Smoke, clove and medicinal (some say band-aid like) flavors all come from various phenols and can be pleasant or ruinous depending on the type, amount and personal tastes.

In this beer I hope to have a noticeable but not unbearable amount of smoke and peatiness.  5 ounces is higher than some recommend but hopefully is not too much.  Depending on the results I will likely brew a future smoked porter (and other smoked beers) with other types of smoked malt (rauchmalt, cherrywood smoked, oak smoked wheat, etc...) in addition or in place of the peated.

8-04-12 Update

Bottled this up finally.  I broke my hydrometer before getting a reading so I don't know the FG.  The flat beer that I tasted was a bit sweet and mildly peaty.  I'm not sure how this one is going to come out, the flavor of the peat seemed mild but interesting and first, but built over time to a strange and unbearable taste that overwhelmed the rest of the flavor.  Hopefully this effect will be lessened with a little carbonation and time.

8-26-12 Update

Tried a bottle today, very low carbonation and head retention is the first thing I notice.  Very sweet and pretty peaty.  The peat was overbearing at first, then subsided, then built up again to the point of unbearable. I'm hoping with a few more months (or years) the flavors will meld better but right now it is pretty much just sweet and peaty in a bad way.

10-11-12

My dad drank some of these with the review "It's kind of weird by itself, but with barbecue it's really, really good." I'll have to try the combination but I could definitely see the sweet and smokey character of this being good with bbq or even good in a marinade or sauce.